"leather is overall much better" this is right
but "There is no point in even mentioning warlocks" is just wrong
+ the Point from Madoxx only m/s > m/r > m/wl are play abel is wrong to m/k and m/p perform rly good too.
I didn't say that they are the only viable classes. I said they are ahead of the others, which it seems im not the only one thinking that.
m/k is decent but class aoe in big pulls is one of the worst. You can do ok dmg in general but if this part is that bad, it is impossible to be competitive in Orkham.
Same problem goes for warlocks, their aoe in general is really low. Yes, they are not bad classes but, again, not close to top tier.
The issue I see with mdps is that all of them have 1 big handicap. I always thought classes shouldn't be perfect and they should be "bad" in atleast one situation... well, rogues don't have that problem.
M/p single sustain dmg is terrible, m/s burst aoe, m/k burst and sustain aoe + single sustain (disaster with with 1 target and broken with 2 targets), m/r burst aoe, etc. They all even while being ok/good classes lack something. For warlocks is the whole aoe situation. For druids, well, everything xD.
When you have pdps competing in every single aspect, your class lacking minimum 1x of them makes you not being able to compete in the top. Yes, you are okish but that's all and that is not fair when it happens in 99% of runs. It is frustrating.
One thing I could see that create a huge gap are the buffs cd. I think m/s performance is the best for me and one of the reasons is that catalysis cd is lower. For all the others, there are 2-3 moments in the ini where my cds are not ready and that make me instantly the last, way under rogues.