Haltbarkeit von EQ

1st Official Post
    • New

    Moin :*


    Es wirkt schon ziemlich dreist, die Haltbarkeit von 85 auf 15 zu reduzieren – und das Ganze dann als angeblichen Fehler zu verkaufen.

    Merkwürdig, dass dieser „Fehler“ ausgerechnet jetzt korrigiert wird. Schon bei den TQ-Karten gab es ähnliche Aktionen,

    und leider wird Prestige dadurch immer unattraktiver gestaltet.

    Bitte überdenkt diese Entscheidung und kommuniziert transparent mit uns, warum solche Änderungen erfolgen.


    Ich wäre dafür das es wieder auf 85% hoch gestuft wird.



    ______________________________________________________________________________________________________________



    Hey

    It feels pretty bold to reduce the durability from 85 to 15 and then present it as a supposed mistake.

    Strangely enough, this “mistake” is only being corrected now. Similar things already happened with the TQ cards,

    and unfortunately, Prestige is becoming less and less attractive because of changes like this.

    Please reconsider this decision and communicate transparently with us about why these kinds of changes are being made.

    I would be in favor of increasing it back to 85%.


  • Moderator

    Approved the thread.
    • New
    • Official Post

    Hello


    As discussed in game previously, this benefit was always meant to only reduce by 15%. We haven't changed or reduced this benefit, only fixed it. The description was always indicating a reduction of only 15%, but in reality due to calculation faults this was reducing instead by 85%. This was fixed. Whilst some bugs may not be discovered until later, they will not be ignored simply because of duration/length of time since implementation.


    This is not a balance change, but a bug fix to give same value that was agreed upon when purchased. There is no plans to reimplement this bug simply because players got used to a higher value than intended.

  • Moderator

    Closed the thread.