558450 [Recibe- Eclipsefang] 558454 [Tarif - Elixir of the Aetherheart]
Hi!
I would like to give some feedback regarding the crafting cost of the item shown in the screenshot (Eclipsefang recipe).
When I saw that it requires 50,000 Arcadia Coins, I was honestly shocked. While some end-game players might be able to farm Arcadia Coins easily, many others — especially:
-
players without a guild,
-
new or mid-level players,
-
players who don’t run instances every day,
— struggle heavily to collect such a high amount.
Many players simply don’t run dungeons constantly, so they naturally don’t gain Arcadia Coins fast enough. As a result, they have a very hard time crafting important quest items. Two of my friends even took a break from the game for this reason, and I personally had to convince them to come back.
🔸 I would also like to point out a similar situation from the past:
When the Talaghan zone was first introduced, many players — including myself — said that the quests were extremely difficult and players were dying far too often while trying to complete them. I remember asking for improvements, but the response at the time was that Talaghan is not meant to be easy.
However, after a long time — and after many players continued struggling — the zone eventually received a very significant nerf. Thanks to that adjustment, the quests became enjoyable and accessible, and players finally started to have fun there.
This example shows that listening to player feedback earlier can prevent frustration and reduce player loss. Responding more warmly and openly to community concerns can greatly improve the game’s long-term health.
🔸 My suggestion:
For quest-related crafting items like this, the Arcadia Coin requirement should not be based on end-game farming potential.
It should be balanced according to new, average, and casual players, who make up a large portion of the community.
I truly believe that adjusting these costs would make the game more enjoyable and prevent many players from feeling overwhelmed or discouraged.
Thanks for reading and considering this feedback!

